Thursday, March 30, 2006

Having to start doing stuff...remembering a Danziger cartoon.

Short post, just thinking about a cartoon by Danziger last year. My husband and I have been deluged with actions locally, our Democrats are getting active. Voter databases, meetings to compile, veterans' committees. Then the mail from Howard Dean at the DNC about the 50 State Canvassing, Door to Door.

50 State Canvassing

Thanks to the overwhelming support from thousands of Democrats, who donated to get the literature for the canvass printed and shipped, we're on schedule and gearing up for the unprecedented Neighbor-to-Neighbor Organizing Day on April 29th.

On that Saturday, thousands of volunteers will recruit hundreds of thousands more Americans committed to changing the status quo this year during door-knocking events in communities across America.

Democrats have a clear vision for America, and we're going to get the word out by making personal contact with our neighbors. And along the way we will build new relationships among volunteers on the ground, a network that will have an impact beyond a single day.


You can print your own door hanger, or have them sent...but the work has to be done locally.
Printing Your Own

They even have canvassing tips:
Canvassing Tips

Ok, now for the cartoon. Howard Dean always said the change would come from us. Guess he means it.


Alternate link for comments

Notes from the Jim Wallis lecture

Some pieces from the lecture/discussion that took place on March 28, closely paraphrased. More to come later.

We have been engaged in a dialog, across the country. Many people are unhappy with the way religion has been used in elections, and the one-sided way religion is being portrayed in the media. People are saying, "Wait a minute, I am a person of faith too, and that is not my faith." I have good news tonight--the monologue of the religious right is over, and a new dialog has begun.

I believe there are two great hungers in the world today. One is for spiritual integrity. The other is for social justice. And the connection between the two is what the world is waiting for. And I see crowds like this across the country who don't know there are so many other people who feel the way they do, who are thinking the same things... and I hope you go away tonight feeling "I am not alone any more."

Conference today in Washington D.C. sponsored by leaders of the religious right and the most right wing leaders of the Republican party, and it was called The War on Christians. I'm concerned too--I've got a 7 year old and a 3 year old. My son called me on my cell phone earlier and said, "Dad, I want to talk about baseball." Wallis coaches son's Little League team and there's a game on Saturday. Says "I am concerned about the moral pollution of this culture. Parenting indeed in this culture has become a counter-cultural activity whether you are liberal or conservative. I care about the dignity and sacredness of human life. I care about family values. But you know what? It seems funny to me that the richest and most powerful religious leaders in America were in Washington, with their allies who are running the government of the world's most powerful nation, and they said there's a way, against them.

The real war is against half of God's children. Three billion people who live on less than two dollars a day, who are not on our agenda, and were certainly not on the agenda today at that conference.

We need to hold both sides accountable to a moral vision.

The religious right was created by the political right. Organize for power, political power. Religion became a wedge to divide us.We should not become the mirror image of that on the other side of the spectrum.

The country is not hungry for a religious right or a religious left, the country is hungry for a new moral center to our public life--not an ideological middle, but a moral center. Don't go left, don't go right--go deeper. The right is comfortable with the language of religion, faith, values, God, so much so that it seems like they think they own the territory. But then they narrow everything to one or two hot button social issues all day, every day in Ohio. I have been asked every single day about abortion and gay marriage, so let me start there. If I was an unborn child, and I wanted the support of the far political right, I should stay unborn as long as possible. Because once you're born, no child care, no health care... (couldn't hear the list over the applause, but )

Cardinal Bernadin talked about a consistent ethic of human life, a seamless garment. All of human life was of concern to him--that's what I want to do.

"I care about the family, and I'm worried that families are really unraveling in this nation. So I went to Focus on the Family in Colorado Springs. And I had a discussion with them. I said I'm with you on the breakdown of the family as a critical moral crisis. My neighborhood has 80% single parent famiies. You can't overcome poverty with 80% single parent families--it's too hard. But please explain to me how gay and lesbian people are the ones responsible for all of that.

They said, okay, we concede that family breakdown is due much more to heterosexual dysfunction than it is to homosexuals, but that doesn't help with our fundraising.

Family is too important to be used just to scapegoat the wrong people. We can be pro-parenting, pro-marriage, pro-kids, pro-family, and pro-gay civil rights at the same time.

We can build common ground. I think pro-life and pro-choice people ought to come together to do something about the tragic and shameful abortion rate in this country, if we work on dramatically reducing the number of unwanted pregnancies. Let's not just keep fighting over symbols, let's do something about decreasing the abortion rate in this country.

We can work on common ground on those two issues, but I want to say, those are not the only two issues, Ohio. They're not the only two issues, because, as an Evangelical Christian, when I find two thousand verses in my Bible about poor people, I insist, fighting poverty is a moral value."

Wallis tells of someone from the National Association of Evangelicals who had a wonderful statement a few months ago. Talking about intelligent design and creationism: "When we meet God, I doubt if God will ask us how we think he created the world. He'll ask us whether we took care of it or not."

The ethics of war--when we go to war, whether we go to war, and whether we tell the truth about going to war are religious and moral values.

Meeting young people on the book tour. Seventeen-year-old at an airport said, I want to shake your hand--you're the only minister I see on tv that I don't throw up after!" High praise from a new generation.

Doing a lot of tv appearances. So, some nights you're on the O'Reilly Factor, and other nights you have fun. Says, actually, I get along well with O'Reilly--we have a rapport. But the next night was a lot more fun--was on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. He's changing American media. He's funny, but he's also pretty serious. He's smart, he's savvy--he cares about so many issues. Asked smart questions backstage, and said, "I'm afraid when I get out there, I'm going to ask silly questions" and I said "John, that's your job."

Wallis goes on to describe the interview (which I think you can still watch on The Daily Show web site) saying he has gotten lots of e-mails since then, which really affected him. From thousands of young people, many of whom have never been to church. They haven't gotten near our churches, but they have impressions of us nonetheless. Said things like, I lost my faith because of television preachers , bad religious fundraisers, pedophile priests, cover-up bishops.... Other e-mails said, I didn't know that you could be Christian and care about poverty, or the environment, or the war in Iraq. They didn't know--and when they heard, they liked it, and he meets these kids all over the country.

I was visiting my home town, Detroit, Michigan, staying at a Days Inn. And the desk clerk, a 21 year old African American woman says, "You have an upgrade." Who gave me the upgrade? She said, "I did. I saw you on The Daily Show--it was awesome!"

Every major social reform movement in our nation's past, abolition of slavery, women's suffrage, child labor laws, civil rights has been fueled and driven in a large part, by religion and by faith--the progressive side. We've surrendered values and faith to the right and they've turned it into a partisan wedge--we must never make that mistake again.

A whole new generation is now ready to step up. I meet them all over the country. I see them wanting to do something big in their lives. The churches ask for the edges of people's lives, and that's just what they get. A new generation wants an agenda worthy of its time, energy, gifts. When I think of the older generation in the peace and justice movement, I think of Habakkuk...

Habakkuk's Complaint
2 How long, O LORD, must I call for help,
but you do not listen?
Or cry out to you, "Violence!"
but you do not save?

3 Why do you make me look at injustice?
Why do you tolerate wrong?
Destruction and violence are before me;
there is strife, and conflict abounds.

4 Therefore the law is paralyzed,
and justice never prevails.
The wicked hem in the righteous,
so that justice is perverted.

Habakkuk is practicing the politics of complaint. He's a liberal. He is like so many who are lamenting, complaining, "Why is is so bad?"

The Lord's response--write the vision, make it plain, so that a runner can read it. Protest is good, but alternatives are better.

Describes the fact that, in the run-up to the war in Iraq, he was one of a group proposing a 6-point plan to disarm Saddam Hussein and remove him from power, but without bombing the children of Baghdad. For a while the plan got some serious discussion, especially in Britain. But he describes how he got the news that his son was about to be born a month early and he rushed home, got home just in time, and had his cell phone on. Went into labor and delivery room and got calls from British parliamentarians, saying, "Is this a good time to discuss the 6-point plan?" My wife is a woman of peace. She said, "Take the calls--I'm not pushing yet!"

Sojourners and Call to Renewal are going to put out their plan in a few months, called A Covenant for a New America.

The young people are ready to go, they're ready to run--do we have a vision for them?

I was asked to speak at Sing Sing prison in upstate New York. I asked, when do you want me to come, and the prisonerer rep said, "Well, we're free most nights! We're kind of a captive audience here!"

I was given a room in the bowels of Sing Sing, this infamous prison, and I was left in a room alone for 5 hours with 80 guys. One of the prisoners said, "You know, Jim, all of us at Sing Sing are from just about 4 or 5 neighborhoods in New York City. It's like a train you get on in my neighborhood when you're 9 or 10 years old, and the train ends up here, at Sing Sing.

But he had a spirtual conversion inside those walls. The New York Theological Seminary offers a Masters of Divinity program inside the walls of that prison. You become a preacher inside the joint--you graduate when your sentence is up. And he looked at me and said, "When I get out, I want to go back and stop that train!"

I was in New York a few years later, and guess who I saw, back home, leading a town meeting on poverty, trying to stop that train. That's what *I* mean by faith-based initiatives.

Alternate link for comments

Another Markos temper-tantrum

I really was about to shut down my computer for the night, but then after seeing this diary at My Left Wing, What Happened to Daily Kos? about some recent kerfuffle having to do with blogger anonymity, I decided to go to Daily Kos and see if there was any front page mention of that. Didn't find anything, but did see this gem from Markos in an open thread. And since I was recently trying to explain to someone recently in an e-mail what it is that bugs me about that dude, this seems to be a teachable moment. From the Mid-afternoon Open Thread:

This morning I've scanned some of the going ons of the last few days (I'm completely out of touch when on the road), and I noticed the dustup over long front page posts. Here's my "official" response: tough shit. If 400 words is too much for you to handle, then you've got a coupe of options: 1) Read the funnies. Not a lot of words there; 2) learn to scroll down a page; 3) get an RSS reader and set it to read just headlines. No extraneous words in headlines; or 4) find a site that better suits your style.

The irregulars are under orders from me NOT to use the extended copy box. So if you've got a problem with that, your problem is with me, not them. And I won't change my policy on that. My god, what would some of you complainers have done back in the Billmon era? Now there were some epic FP posts!

What a charmer. Temper-tantrums, sometimes peppered with profanity, are his standard mode of response when challenged. See the "pie wars". See his dismissive treatment of the "fraudsters".

Look, good for him that his site became so successful, to the point that many big name politicians post there. I don't begrudge him that. I do, of course, wish that if politicians were going to do the "grassroots" thing, they could be flocking to a site that was truly collaborative and "democratic". Don't know what that would be--maybe a new thing that is more of a consortium. Some sort of group effort rather than one guy's blog.

Oh, and one more thing. I'll buy his book when the weather forecast is partly cloudy with a chance of ass-monkeys.



This post was brought to you by Renee's "bad wolf", who sometimes just insists on getting a word in. Easy, girl...

Alternate link for comments

Wednesday, March 29, 2006

Major networks refuse to run inclusive mainline church ad

I've seen posts about this all over the progressive blogosphere, so I figure I would be remiss not to mention it here as well. Below are some screen captures (via Americablog) of the latest United Church of Christ ad, which major networks are, once again, refusing to air. We seriously need to call them on this.



As John in DC of Americablog says:

If that isn't a civil rights law suit, I don't know what it. The religious right would be suing these networks for violating the civil rights act, in a flash. TV networks like ABC simply cannot pick and choose which religious groups they let advertise - religious right good, United Church of Christ bad. Where are our lawsuits?

Anyway, check out this ad. Then go to the action alert and tell ABC and the other networks to stop the war on Christians.

Alternate link for comments

Open Thread

Since I have to work today, I won't be able to attend the workshop that is scheduled as a follow-up to last night's Jim Wallis lecture/discussion. Hope I can find out the details from someone.

Follow-up Workshop: Prophetic Advocacy 101

I just downloaded the audio from last night's event from my voice recorder to my computer, and hope to be able to write up a summary tonight. One thing I can tell you is that last night was meant to be the energizing event to get people of faith in Ohio working together on issues of social justice. Jim talked about the Let Justice Roll campaign, which is working to raise the minimum wage. More later--have a great day, everyone.

Alternate link for comments

Tuesday, March 28, 2006

C-Span, Air America and my Mom

In the last few years, my enthusiasm for my trip to Florida has been diminished by the anticipation of what condition I would find my mother's health in. Diagnosed with Parkinson's disease five years ago, my mother knew her health would take difficult turns. She always held the Pope's long survival up as an example of her possible path. After his death last year, we stopped using him as a comparison but my mother continued the math. She had always subtracted two years from the Pope's present state and then arrived at what she should be like. The Pope is no longer part of our conversation.

My yearly trips have increased into bi-annual, and now they are "whenever possible." My mother had requested that my sisters and I come and help her decide how to disperse her collection of three generations of family jewelry. While none of us sisters are very materialistic, I felt that my claim needed to be represented, and besides, winter in Chicago-land did not seem to be giving up and the Florida sun would be appreciated.

It had been less than three months since my last visit but the Parkinson's disease had marched forward. She didn't rise from her chair as I entered my parents' home. Both arms bent upward from her elbows and her left leg extended at the knee waving in a tremor. Her eyes gave me a loving greeting followed by a soft "How are you?" This quiet spoken. frail woman gave no hint of her previous vivacious personality. This yoga teaching, health food eating, Berkinstock wearing, Democratic leaning. Howard Dean voter (sorry I can't help but add this) quietly waited for my hug as I stooped down.

My father still loves to entertain his visiting children and scheduled a back-waters fishing trip. My parents' routine consists of having a helper come in two days a week so my father can get out. My mother enjoyed the young Haitian aids but we couldn't figure out why she gave my father excuses to cancel the new middle-aged American helper. She finally revealed her hesitation. "That woman is a right wing Republican and she doesn't like the TV and radio that I have on." She finally agreed to have her come when she decided, "I am going to watch C-Span and listen to Air America any way. Maybe I will enlighten her." She grinned with that spark in her eye she always had while she raised me.

Whenever I entered her bedroom she would be either looking at the TV that was two feet in front of her face or leaning to the left listening through the static to Air America. "Look at that, those Californians are upset about the new laws on immigrations" or say. "Isn't that Randi Rhodes great? Do you know she is really a pretty? I saw her on TV. I would never have guessed that because she sounds so tough on the radio."

We don't really use the "D" word much. She prefers to talk about "going to the other side" or "passing through the door." We have both gotten discouraged with the way our democracy is going. She thinks if she keeps learning about what is happening she can help, meanwhile I do my part by organizing another meetup or peace rally. Yesterday while listening to a senate debate, she looked up to me and said. "When I am on the other side, I will be working to help you make a better America." I smiled and said, "Yes mom, you will be in good company along the side of Thomas Jefferson and Martin Luther King."

As I fly home in the plane, I look down at my mother's wedding ring that barely fits my pinky finger. I know that I have inherited more that a few pieces of jewelry. While my younger sister has my mother's passion for shopping and my older sister carries on her love of sports, I can see I am the one that inherited her fire in the belly to fight for a better America.

Alternate link for comments

Tuesday Morning Roundup

It's rainy here in Columbus today, and this kind of weather makes me want to crawl back under the covers and, uh, "meditate". Okay, nap...

But there are some posts/articles I'd like to point out, so, in a minimalist way, here goes:

Citizen Action Steps: Phase Two From Firedoglake, on having Russ Feingold's back with the censure issue.

'Herald' Says Justice Scalia Makes 'Obscene Gesture'
Sources disagree on *which* obscene gesture, but it was definitely rude, and he made the gesture in church. Tsk, tsk.

Media Bias on Iraq? Nah... Via Plunderbund, a great video clip of Lara Logan responding to Bush administration "blame the messenger" claims that the media is only reporting the bad news in Iraq.

The Perfect Candidate: From Ohio 2nd, Mrs. Editor's enthusiastic endorsement of Subodh Chandra

Ohio's Constitutional Amendment Banning Gay Marriage Undermines Domestic Violence Law Hmmm-...didn't some of us predict that this was coming if that amendment passed. Yeah, I think we did.

Here's the link to last night's interactive blogging session at My Vote is My Voice. It was about the immigration march in L.A., and about the problems with Senator Frist's immigration bill.

Alternate link for comments

DemocracyFest Update

THE Bloggers' Breakfast is returning to DemocracyFest this year!

It's not a brunch, Kos won't be there, no need to protest ;-)

Darrell asked me to share the following with you:

It started out simple enough...nothing more then an off topic discussion on the Dean For America blog about the homemade apple butter that was simmering in my kitchen. It was just another of those occasional digressions from the serious topics of politics that made the blog a "community" in cyberspace. Before the night ended, an invitation had been made and accepted by several bloggers to come to Iowa to help the Dean Campaign, where I would serve up a home cooked Iowa breakfast featuring my apple butter.

Several months passed and on a cold January, 2004 morning in Des Moines, Iowa, bloggers from 29 states gathered at the first "Bloggers Breakfast". Although the numbers who came made it impossible to make the entire meal myself; yes, it did include my homemade apple butter. It was the first real face to face gathering of the Internet driven grassroots community that was developing from the Howard Dean candidacy.

It was an emotional high point for many of us who had been working so hard in the campaign and who knew each other only by names like, "Darrell in Iowa" for much of the previous year. We repeated the breakfast again at the first DemocracyFest with even greater attendance and with equal enthusiasm and emotion.

Since those days many have continued very involved and others have taken time to stand back and reflect, myself being among the later. With another important election year before us it seems time for those of us who stepped away to join again with those who have kept our "blog" community alive.

I hope to see all of you again in San Diego at the Third Annual DemocracyFest and particularly hope you join me for breakfast.

- "Darrell in Iowa"

Alternate link for comments

Monday, March 27, 2006

Thoughts on the political-religious "spectrum"

This post can also be found as a podcast here. If you want to go directly to mp3 download, click this link.

I opened the paper this week, looking to see if there was any coverage of the new We Believe group, or of the upcoming lecture/discussion with Jim Wallis. I was terribly disappointed to find, instead, that The Other Paper had a cover story entitled "The Dwindling Religious Middle".

Isn't that a bit premature? In my experience, there isn't even widespread awareness yet of faith voices speaking out from a point of view *other* than the far right. I am sure, for example, that many more people were aware of the Justice Sunday events than the diverse, interdenominational events that were held in response to them. I have often heard secular progressives complain that people of faith are not being vocal enough in countering the message of the religious right. I find that very frustrating, because the truth is, there are, and always have been such voices, but they simply don't get as much press. The Other Paper, which *has* given front page, in-depth attention to pastors like Rod Parsley and Russell Johnson, seems intent on being part of the problem. When they finally do get around to acknowledging the people of faith who are advocating a more compassionate, neighborly way of putting faith into action, it is only in the context of describing the plight of the "religious middle". In my mind, the fact that a letter Rev. Tim Ahrens sent out to dozens of area pastors in November has blossomed into a new organization built around the common ground shared by diverse people of faith should be, by itself, front page news. But the Other Paper article glossed over that news on its way to covering the plight of ministers who do not want to be political.

There are a number of things I find troubling about this article. The first is that, even though it is an "alternative" publication, the article falls into the same tired black and white way of seeing the world as most mainstream news sources. Right versus left, with us or against us...can't we please just *try* to have some dialog that doesn't force a dichotomy where one doesn't exist?

From the article: Wallis would like to position himself as a moderate, but the fact that he is embraced by the left probably gives away his proper place in the political-religious spectrum.

Well, thank you for speaking for him. Without translating the words *he* chooses into stark, black and white terms, people might be forced to grapple with the notion that the political-religious spectrum is just that--a spectrum, with a whole range of hues and gradations.

But you notice what the writer just did--he conveyed the message that Wallis is *really* aligned with the left, but didn't *quite* say it is so many words. He left himself some wiggle room--some plausible deniability.

Getting back to the idea of a spectrum, there really is a full continuum of viewpoints, from liberal to conservative on any number of issues. Someone may be more conservative on issues of personal liberties, but more liberal on economic issues, for example. Or vice-versa. Of course, when you step into the voting booth, you typically are faced with a series of either-or decisions. Do I vote for this candidate or that one? Yes or no on this particular issue?

In a time when this country has a president known for such stark statements as "You're either with us or against us", and when the religious leaders who get the most media attention frame political issues in similarly stark terms, it is easy to fall into that type of black and white thinking. But that doesn't mean that they *should*. Certainly, anyone who wishes to call him or herself a *journalist* should be able to see that issues are more complex than that, and, if they are worth their salt, they should be able to find a way to communicate these complex issues to the public in a way that can be understood.

We *must* learn to find common ground and work to create win-win outcomes. The We Believe group, in my opinion, is on the right track. Look at the home page--the tag line is "Uniting diverse religious voices to achieve social justice". By implication, David Niven casts We Believe as liberal, even though they represent a broad range of positions on the spectrums of faith and public policy. I'm sure there are members who, on the "hot button issues" of homosexuality and abortion, have views that are similar to those espoused by Rod Parsley and Russell Johnson. But they disagree with them on other issues, and have covenanted with the rest of the membership of We Believe to work together on issues where they share common ground. The group, as a whole, shares the "strong belief that we must act and speak in public ways to support the poor, the children, and those who are voiceless and unrepresented in our times".

And that is precisely who suffers if we continue to perpetuate the myth that issues of faith and politics are black and white and center around a couple highly divisive issues. It pained me and, yes, even angered me, to see the needs of those Jesus called "the least of these" go unaddressed while people of faith were persuaded of the dire need to vote for a constitutional amendment to make same sex marriage even more illegal in Ohio than it already was. Sometimes it's okay to be angry, and injustice makes me angry. It also angers me, with so much at stake, to see people who purport to be journalists taking their cues from people who, for their own political purposes, want to paint issues of faith and politics in stark, black and white, "with us or against us" terms. They need to do better than that, and, as much as I don't need something else on my to-do list, it's our job to call them on it when they start dumbing things down to the point that they are misrepresenting the truth.

Oh, and did I mention that I *really* have enough to do already, thank you very much. But then I hear about people like Maggie Kuhn, and I feel inspired, humbled, and a little sheepish that I'm not doing more...

Maggie Kuhn, the Gray Panthers charismatic leader changed the face of society with regard to the elderly. She was a committed, hard-working woman who at age 65 began an organization that continues her tradition of fighting for a better life for all. Her advice for those who want to make a change in the world is, "Go to the people at the top - that is my advice to anyone who wants to change the system, any system. Don't moan and groan with like-minded souls. Don't write letters or place a few phone calls and then sit back and wait. Leave safety behind. Put your body on the line. Stand before the people you fear and speak your mind--even if your voice shakes. When you least expect it, someone may actually listen to what you have to say. Well-aimed slingshots can topple giants."

Okay, *fine* Maggie. You do make a compelling point. Guess I just need to "keep on keeping on". Now, I just *know* that slingshot is around here somewhere...

UPDATE: Please check out the whole article and share your thoughts with the writer if you feel so inclined. You can select David Niven from the drop-down menu here

http://www.theotherpaper.com/topwriter_submit.html

Something I mentioned in the podcast that didn't make it into this post is the fact that the other big issue I had with this article is the portrayal of ministers "staying out of politics" as a positive or desirable thing.

There IS NO getting away from politics. It touches everything. It is, in fact, "made of people". And if we just keep trying to respond with charity to the new ways the far right finds of trashing every safety net we have, there's no way we'll ever be able to keep up. The "least of these" will be much better off if they get *justice* than charity, but we can't work for justice without getting some politics on us.

Alternate link for comments

MViMV Guest Blog

Tonight's MViMV Guest Blogger will be Kety Esquivel from 8:00 - 8:30pm EST

http://blog.myvoteismyvoice.com/

Kety has over ten years of experience in the domestic and international non-profit, private and political sectors. Currently, Kety is the Communications Director for Latinos for America. She is the founder of CrossLeft, a grass roots organization created to provide a voice for Progressive Christians. In addition to Hispanic/Latino outreach for the Wesley Clark for President campaign, her domestic experience includes a three year stint with Eastman Kodak Company's United States, Canada and Latin American regional operations, where she coached executives on issues of human capital and diversity. Her international work experience includes three years in China working in higher education, management and consulting and prior to that a brief stint in Ethiopia working for the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa.

Alternate link to comments

The Unity Campaign

By now, we've all heard of Nixon's "Southern Strategy" and the politics of "divide and conquer". It is time now for a "Campaign of Unity". It's a winning philosophy, a way to heal our country and appeal to our better nature rather than our baser instincts. It's also one that's rarely tried.

Those of us who were involved saw the unity approach in the Dean campaign, in which he appealed to "all Americans regardless of party to join this movement to take our country back." The result was thousands of devoted Republicans who crossed lines to join the Dean movement. In fact, I know of a gentleman from here in Alabama who jumped ship to support Dean after more than 20 years of voting Republican, from Reagan to George W. Bush in 2000. To this day, the gentleman remains one of the most zealous supporters of Dean. So, the 'open hand' approach is a winning approach, but the same people who still think it's smart for Democrats to run an 18-state strategy ignore it.

As a Democrat since I first registered to vote in 1984, I honestly think that it's time that candidates stopped emphasizing party labels and run as Dean did, as an American. Talk to the American people about how certain political, religious and monied interests have made it part of their strategy to exploit differences in ethnicity, wealth, gender and sexuality for their own gain, then put policies in place that undermine us all, and our country. Talk about how that strategy has prevented us from making progress in a whole range of areas, and how much better we are as a country when there is true spirit of unity. Speak about this to Christian conservatives. Let them know how their faith has been exploited in the divisive strategy and present them the better course.

We may win some elections here and there by running simply as Democrats, or on other matters, but we will really win as a country when the American people are presented with an alternate vision to '"divide and conquer", one which bring us together. And isn't that we really want in the long run?

Alternate link for comments

Sunday, March 26, 2006

Reframing censure

From Firedoglake:

"The question isn't 'should the president be censured? The question is, 'Why does it take a censure resolution to get the majority party to pay even lip service to fulfilling its constitutional obligation to provide oversight with respect to the actions and policies of the executive and judicial branches of this government?' It's time for the Congress, and particularly the Republicans, to decide whether choosing to protect the president instead of choosing to protect the interests of the American people, is the wisest course of action, and whether that choice is truly serving national security, or political power."

Discuss.

Or, discuss something else. I don't do the cat-herding thing. ;-)



Alternate link for comments

Faith and Politics Event in Columbus Today

Crossposted at Faithful Ohio

Two Evangelical Perspectives: Jim Wallis Debates Russell Johnson Today (March 26) in Columbus
When: 3:30-5:00 pm
Where: Capital Theater 77 South High St. Columbus, OH 43215
Who: Jim Wallis, founder of Sojourners and best-selling author of God's Politics: Why the Right Gets it Wrong and the Left Doesn't Get It and Rev. Russell Johnson, chairman of the Ohio Restoration Project.

Thanks to Upper Arlington Progressive Alliance for the heads-up about this event. I won't be able to attend, but would really like to be able to post first hand accounts from people who do. If you do attend the event in Columbus this coming Sunday and would like to submit your own summary and thoughts about it, you can e-mail me at ohiorenee at gmail.com.

More about the event, and some relevant links:

What: A one-hour dialogue between Jim Wallis and the Ohio Restoration Project chairman Russell Johnson on the role of faith in politics followed by a Q&A session.

Why: Our nation is hungry for an open dialogue on moral values and their role in the public square. The goal of this gathering is to discuss how various social issues - including abortion, poverty, the environment, advancing peace, and promoting strong families - are all critical moral and community values that can be approached from differing evangelical perspectives.


Update: I clicked the link that was provided for ordering the tickets, and found that it is now "sold out". Since the tickets are free, I wonder how many people ordered them on spec, not being sure yet if they would be able to attend. The notice reads: This event has reached capacity, and we are no longer accepting registrations in advance. So, can people still get in at the door? I suspect that's possible. I also wonder if some churches have ordered blocks of tickets for any of their parishioners who might want to attend. There is another event with Jim Wallis on Tuesday, March 28, and as far as I can tell, that one does not require a reservation.

The cover story on this week's edition of The Other Paper (a local alternative news weekly) is entitled "The Dwindling Religious Middle". My first thought is that such an article is horribly premature, as I think many people still aren't aware that there is even such a thing as the "religious left". Many other thoughts (none of them complimentary toward the article) followed my first thought, and I am in the process of fleshing them out into a post. But in the meantime, check out the article yourself and see what you think.

Alternate link for comments

Saturday, March 25, 2006

It's the Spring Beagle, Charlie Brown


This is funny...you knew there had to be a "war on Easter" lurking in the wings somewhere, didn't you? Seen on Worldnet Daily, reported by Pandagon:

Already, many stores and malls across the U.S. are preparing for seasonal events, with some refraining from usage of terms like "the Easter Bunny," opting instead for more generic terms like "Spring Bunny," or other names avoiding the name "Easter."

One such location is the Somerset Collection, an upscale mall in Troy, Mich., serving 14 million shoppers per year. It's now publicizing an event with its "Spring Bunny" and Walt Disney's Winnie the Pooh.

The event caught the attention of WorldNetDaily reader Tim Edwards, who says, "It appears that this very important Christian holiday is under assault just like Christmas is."
Except, come on, y'all don't really *like* that aspect of Easter, do you? You know, the pagan aspect? Seems like you wouldn't want to emphasize the connections between this "very important Christian holiday" and pagan fertility symbols.

The legends of ancient Egypt connect the hare, which comes out at night to feed, with the moon.

Yeah, and rabbits are known for doing it like--for doing it *a lot*.

Alternate link for comments

Happy 2nd birthday to DFA. Formed March 18, 2004.

Click here for the Happy birthday, Oscar post, and give Oscar a shout-out in the comments.

Democracy for America turned two years old last week. The video of the Seattle announcement is still at C-Span. That was sure a noisy event, but it was a happy kind of noise. It was just one month after he dropped out of the race. He never looked back, just kept moving ahead.

One thing I noticed as I reread the speech he made. He is incorporating the same goals into the DNC as he did into DFA. He is still using the small donor strategy at the DNC. He still speaks of changing the debate. He still speaks of how important local races are for us to be involved in. He may not be as obvious about it, but I have noticed this.

Whenever the Democratic leaders get too quiet, he goes on TV and has things to say. Like the radio interview in San Antonio, when he said the war was not winnable. All hell broke loose, but it is all over front page news now.

Here is the video from C-Span.
March 18, 2004 in Seattle.
Howard Dean Announcement of Democracy for America

Here is the text of the speech from one of my very favorite sites.


Announcing 'Democracy For America' in Seattle

With enthusiasm like this, I'll scare my staff, and threaten to get back in the race again...

[Thunderous applause and screams]...

That was a joke! Only joking. I see Roy Neel over there having a heart attack.

Let me thank you for changing the debate in 2004. You made the Democratic message much tougher, you made this party ready to challenge George Bush, and you've changed politics forever by showing that a campaign that's powered by ordinary Americans can emerge from nowhere and build support to take back this country, which is exactly what we are going to do.

The right wingers in Washington are getting a little nervous, they think we might actually take back America!

I want to talk about how we're going to do that. I'm going to talk about what we face. It is very clear to me that George W. Bush is a failed President. This...Under George Bush's leadership, we have lost 2.3 million jobs, more jobs than any President has lost since Herbert Hoover. Manufacturing jobs going overseas - there are solutions to this, but the solutions George Bush shuns - environmental, labor, and human rights standards around the world that would make global trade work. George Bush has opposed fair wage and overtime policies that would help our workers in difficult times. Today the minimum wage is 30% lower than it was under Richard Nixon. A single mother working full time for minimum wage earns less than $11,000 a year, $4,000 below the poverty line.

It's not right, and we can do better and we will do better.

Next, one thing that our campaign has proved for ordinary Americans is that you do not have to be wealthy and well connected, and fund your own campaign to run for office in this country. We ran for office by getting hundreds of thousands of Americans to give us 5, 10, 15, 200, 100 dollars. We want other people to take that lesson so that ordinary people can participate, not just in the political process by giving money in small donations or voting, but by running for office. And we want to duplicate what we did for school board members, and county commissioners, and state legislators to get the right wing out of politics, out of our bedroom, and out of our wallets.

So, let me thank you again, you are all great, Seattle's a... (some one in audience shouts, "you are great!" Dean smiles and laughs)...all right, we're all great. This is a real opportunity, and we can say we started it here in Seattle. We really do have the opportunity to make this country into what we all believe it ought to be. We have the opportunity to change leaders so our leaders are as good as the extraordinary American people are. We have the power to take Washington back for ordinary Americans and make this country as great as it ought to be. Let's make that happen.

We're going to keep at it, because we know what happens in Washington, is that once they get there they get cozy. And it's your job to make sure that never again does the Democratic Party lay down and die and stop fighting for what we believe in. Thank you very much.


This picture appears to be from the Seattle announcement.



Here is the pic of the 3rd DFA announcement in NY at the New School.


Happy Birthday DFA.

Alternate link for comments

Happy birthday, Oscar!

Looking at the overnight thread, I was struck by how many HEPs are either on the road or somehow in transition. Denise just moved into her new digs, and jc is in the process of moving. Donna is away from Evanston visiting her son, and listener checked in from Frankfort, on her way to Scotland. And is Thankful still Thankful*on*the*road? She was last time I checked.

One thing I really love about this blog community is the way that we can check in at here no matter where we are physically--a virtual "home away from home".

And even when life is too busy for some of us to find the time to check in, they are still with us in spirit. Thank you, jc, for reminding us that today is Oscar's birthday. I miss Oscar's daily dose of cartoons now that he is working too many hours to have time for that (and still finding time to volunteer for a local candidate). But, like many of you, I am thankful that he does stop by when he has the chance, and occasionally even treats us to cartoons when he has a day off.

Also, for anyone who might not be aware of this, for the 2004 election, Oscar created a handout entitled "Why Evangelical Christians Must Vote Against George W. Bush".

Happy birthday, Oscar, and thank you for all you do. We miss you, and we're leaving the light on for you. :-)



Alternate link for comments

Friday, March 24, 2006

Speak your mind, even if your voice shakes

A few weeks ago I was thinking about the quote, "Speak your mind, even if your voice shakes". Since I decided to do some audioblog reflections as my Lenten observance this year, that particular quote has taken on special significance for me. So, for the first time, it occurred to me to find out where that quote originated. I found out that it was Maggie Kuhn, founder of the Gray Panthers. Posting about that inspired jc to create a new bumper sticker--she already had one with the quote, but now she could include the attribution.



It's amazing how many opportunities there are to discover new role models--ones that until recently I didn't know existed. This is one of the first things I read about her:
Maggie Kuhn, the Gray Panthers charismatic leader changed the face of society with regard to the elderly. She was a committed, hard-working woman who at age 65 began an organization that continues her tradition of fighting for a better life for all. Her advice for those who want to make a change in the world is, "Go to the people at the top - that is my advice to anyone who wants to change the system, any system. Don't moan and groan with like-minded souls. Don't write letters or place a few phone calls and then sit back and wait. Leave safety behind. Put your body on the line. Stand before the people you fear and speak your mind—even if your voice shakes. When you least expect it, someone may actually listen to what you have to say. Well-aimed slingshots can topple giants."

Here's part of the entry about her on the web site of the National Women's Hall of Fame.
In 1970, forced to retire from her career with the Presbyterian Church at age 65, Kuhn and a group of her friends in similar circumstances organized and founded an organization which became the Gray Panthers. The organization was created to work on issues of concern to the elderly, such as pension rights and age discrimination, but also to concern itself with larger public issues, such as the Vietnam War and other social concerns. At the core of the Gray Panthers' message was that older people needed to seize control of their lives and be in the active world working for issues in which they believed. Kuhn's candor, charisma and lively approach to the needs and problems of the old drew major media attention, and the group was successfully launched, coming to represent in the public mind that power and energy that the elderly can represent. Kuhn fought off efforts by everyone from politicians to the managers of nursing homes to treat the elderly like amusing children, instead insisting on a place at the table and voice in decision-making that affected the lives of the old.

I wonder how many other stories are out there, just waiting to inspire me. Do you have a favorite you'd like to share?

Alternate link for comments

Hawks Who Should Eat Crow

Crossposted at Disabled Americans for Democracy

Congress adjourned for their Spring Break on March 16. Before leaving, the Senate passed the Budget Resolution, acting on a number of amendments to it. here's The Daily Digest for March 16, 2006.

Some thirty amendments were offered to the resolution. We shall mention just a few of them.

  • Adopted
    • Gregg (for Obama) Amendment No. 3144, to provide a $40 million increase in fiscal year 2007 for the Homeless Veterans Reintegration Program and to improve job services for hard-to-place veterans.

    • Nelson Amendment No. 3001, to provide funds ensuring Survivor Benefit Plan annuities are not reduced by the amount of dependency and indemnity compensation that military families receive, and to provide funds for ``paid-up'' SBP, offset by closing abusive corporate tax loopholes.

  • Rejected
    • By 43 yeas to 53 nays (Vote No. 59), Lieberman/Mikulski Amendment No. 3034, to protect the American people from terrorist attacks by providing $8 billion in additional funds for homeland security government-wide, by restoring cuts to vital first responder programs in the Departments of Homeland Security and Justice, by providing an additional $1.2 billion for first responders, $1.7 billion for the Coast Guard and port security, $150 million for chemical security, $1 billion for rail and transit security, $456 million for FEMA, $1 billion for health preparedness programs, and $752 million for aviation security.

    • By 46 yeas to 54 nays (Vote No. 63), Stabenow Amendment No. 3141, to provide an assured stream of funding for veteran's health care that will take into account the annual changes in the veterans' population and inflation to be paid for by restoring the pre-2001 top rate for income over $1 million, closing corporate tax loopholes and delaying tax cuts for the wealthy.

    • By 46 yeas to 53 nays (Vote No. 67), Kerry Modified Amendment No. 3143, to prevent the imposition of excessive TRICARE fees and co-pays on military retirees.

    • Akaka Amendment No. 3044, to provide $310 million over five years in mandatory funding for non-service pensions for World War II Filipino veterans, paid for by closing corporate tax loopholes.


We commend the Senate for passing the Obama and Nelson amendments, however regretable it may be that they have become necessary. This writer is appalled that any question of adequately providing for homeless veterans or for the dependants of service personnelle should arise. However, the Senate is on record with these votes. Vidulent citizens must remember and hold their senators to their word.

It is instructive to look at who voted against two of the "rejected" amendments, those offered by Sens Stabenow and Kerry.

Voting against both amendments:
Alexander
Allard
Allen
Bennet
Bond
Brownback
Bunning
Burr
Chambliss
Coburn
Cochran
Coleman
Collins
Cornyn
Craig
Crapo
DeMint
Dole
Domenici
Ensign
Enzi
Frist
Graham
Grassley
Gregg
Haggel
Hatch
Hutchison
Inhofe
Isakson
Kyl
Lott
Lugar
Martinez
McCain
McConnell
Murkowski
Roberts
Santorum
Sessions
Shelby
Smith
Stevens
Sununu
Talent
Thomas
Thune
Vitter
Voinovich
Warner

We shall set aside for the moment the rank hypocrisy of John McCain, the *only* veteran currently serving in the Senate, voting *against* measures that would assist veterans and military retirees. Clearly, goose stepping with the administration ranks as a higher priority for him right now than solidarity with his brothers in arms.

The larger, and more important, point is to observe who among those voting no on the Kerry and Stabenow amendments voted *for* the Iraq War Resolution. In other words, which Republican senators voted to authorize the Iraq war, but now refuse to deal honorably with those who must fight it? The answer should not come as a surprise to readers here.

Yes on Iraq War Resolution *and* no on Kerry & Stabenow Amendments
Allard
Allen
Bennet
Bond
Brownback
Bunning
Cochran
Collins
Craig
Crapo
Domenici
Ensign
Enzi
Frist
Grassley
Gregg
Hagel
Hatch
Hutchison
Inhofe
Kyl
Lott
Lugar
McCain
McConnell
Murkowski
Roberts
Santorum
Sessions
Shelby
Smith
Stevens
Thomas
Voinovich
Warner

If you vote to authorize war, then you have a moral obligation to see to it that those who fight that war are provided for. Veterans and military retirees give to this country, sacrifice for this country in ways that senators, sitting on their fat arses in their plush offices can't even begin to imagine.

Honoring veterans, retirees and their families means a hell of a lot more than waving flags and pinning cheap yellow ribbons to your car. Honoring veterans, retirees and their families means making sure that the health care they receive is affordable and high quality. Honoring veterans means providing for them and their families when they are wounded. It means putting your money where your mouth is and fully funding the VA, not backing away from a morally correct act in order to ass-kiss a weak, incompetent, and morally bankrupt partisan leader.

Perhaps in the short term, these senators' constituents will commend them for "holding down spending." But History and the Almighty will judge them as the craven hypocrites they are.


Alternate link for comments

Thursday, March 23, 2006

Dean went after Bush for saying he would leave Iraq for next president.

It was a thing of beauty to watch this video. I never get up early, so we missed the interview. Much appreciation to Bradblog for catching it. Howard Dean had to fight to get his points out. Soledad kept trying to interrupt, and he kept talking over her.

He also got good points in about the Medicare D bill. He pointed out that the president had the airwaves to say what he wanted, but the Democrats had to fight to get their message out. Good interview.

Video:

Howard Dean with Soledad O'Brien this morning

From the statement at Bradblog:

Howard Dean filibustered CNN's Soledad O'Brien to push the message that the Democratic Party has an effective strategy for changing the course in Iraq.

While the President Bush and the Republican noise machine are blaming the press, Dean said that the Democrats are having difficulty getting media coverage.

On the plan for Iraq, Dean said "We do believe that we can't withdraw immediately... Over the next couple of years we need to bring the troops home." On the apparent divided opinions of Democrats Dean said "There's a middle ground between Jack Murtha and Joe Biden and we think it makes a lot of sense."

Will the strategy as described by Howard Dean convince American's that the Democrats can get Iraq on track towards a resolution? Should the Democrats come together and support a single specific plan for Iraq?




Alt Comment Link

Movie Review: V For Vendetta

V For Vendetta is a movie made for the post-9/11 world. It is a vision of a future that looks eerily similar to our own--if we as citizens do not wrestle power from the forces that currently hold it in their grasp.

As the character V (Hugo Weaving) says at one point in the film, "People should not fear their governments.Governments should fear their people." V becomes the impetus to bring that about with a plan to bring down the corrupt government which has destroyed his life and country, creating the skilled assassin that he becomes.

V, disguised in a Guy Fowlkes mask, uses cunning and violence as his means to an end. But the latter seems to be the only language the government he opposes understands, as it uses torture and murder to intimidate and destroy freedom and any opponent of its policies. There's a true eeriness in a scene of torture, as you're reminded that the Bush Administration has been reported to have used similar tactics in its detainment of suspects. In the case of the film, those suspects happen to be its own citizens.

V For Vendetta is both a frightening and hopeful vision. Despite V's approach to conflict resolution, the film reminds us that in the end it is the people who allow their freedoms to be taken away and it is they who must ultimately take it back. Sound familiar?

Gather your friends, colleagues, DFA group, etc. and go to see this film.

Alternate link for comments

Russ Feingold on The Daily Show

Crooks and Liars has the video, and I agree with their assessment of Feingold's performance. He definitely rocked. It was a bit disappointing that he wasn't actually in the studio with Jon Stewart, but one thing that struck me is that this is the sort of interview Howard had to work at for a while so that he didn't appear stiff. Russ Feingold came across natural and relaxed--and above all, incredibly *reasonable* in what he was saying. Certainly compared to the shrill cries from the right that he sides with the terrorists because he wants to protect the basic rights of American citizens.



I did record the interview with the intention of doing a transcript later on, but here's a piece of what Feingold said, courtesy of Crooks and Liars.

Feingold: I was taught that the congress makes the laws and the president is supposed to sign them and enforce them. He's not supposed to make them up.---How many times are we going to let George Bush and Dick Cheney say you guys don't support the troops, you're not patriotic and let them push us around?

FYI, some housekeeping issues--I put Catreona's diary back in draft since there were no comments yet. I wanted it to get enough air time, since I know that she spent a lot of time researching it. I'll be away from the computer during business hours, but one of the other contributers can flip the switch and publish it, maybe around lunch time. There is also another draft waiting (I feel so spoiled with posts written for the rest of the day!). It is a review of the movie V is for Vendetta by Darryl (aka Dardango). A warm HEP welcome to Dar!

Alternate link for comments

Wednesday, March 22, 2006

Stuff you should know

Another one of those posts with assorted unrelated items that deserve front page attention...

Russ Feingold will be "The Daily Show with Jon Stewart" tonight. The show will be on at 10:00 pm Central (11:00 Eastern) and rebroadcast two hours later, as well as tomorrow at 7:00 pm Central. Don't forget to vote in Russ's "Pick a Progressive Patriot".

For anyone who hasn't heard yet, IndySteve is running for Congress.

We have a couple of major events coming up here in Columbus with Jim Wallis (author of God's Politics). On Sunday, he will be debating Rev. Russell Johnson, chairman of the Ohio Restoration Project, about the role of faith in politics. Then, on Tuesday, March 28, Wallis will be leading a public lecture and discussion on faith, values, and politics. You can learn more about both events at my blog, Faithful Ohio.

Good post on Firedoglake about the Cegelis/Duckworth race and how the DC Dems need us if they want to win: Together, Can We Do Better?

And finally, since I had to go and bring up that whole frustrating situation of the D.C. Dems undercutting the grassroots, I offer this picture of a baby panda from this Baby Animals site. Just wanted to end this post with something to make us smile.



Alternate link for comments

Charlie Grapski running for office

In Charlie's previous guest-blog-he-didn't-know-he-was-writing (it was part of a comment he made at BFA) he wrote about the need for Americans to make a change From Subjects to Citizens. Earlier this evening at BFA, Thankful*on*the*Road reposted some of Charlie's comments, and I discovered that I'd missed the two comments that led up to the one that I posted here earlier. Here it is. No, I don't know what he's running for, but maybe one of you knows. Or maybe he'll come by and tell us--I did e-mail him this evening. --Renee

Hey everyone,
Just stopping bye to say Hi - and give an update - busy, busy, busy lately (which is why I have been so "quiet" :) ).

The campaign is finally OFFICIAL and just now underway. We began collecting petitions to be on the ballot last night. We are now beginning our fundraising drive - and we will have a website up shortly. I certainly hope everyone will stop by and log in ... I hope that many of you will be part of my larger "grassroots" team (while we build a local grassroots "model citizens' army" to EMPOWER the disempowered "subject" into an active and effective CITIZEN).

Oh well - several of you have already expressed your encouragement to this effort - I hope to get you guys a little more involved in time - and expand to others.

I really think Dean and Trippi unleashed a sleeping giant in the last presidential cycle - at a national politics level (with a grassroots movement).

I hope that I can develop - and demonstrate the efficacy of - taking this down to the LOCAL level. We intend to have a number of innovative ideas - as well as to apply the great lessons of our efforts nationally in 2004.

This is a real TEAM effort - I (as the candidate and future representative) may be the center-point of the play and may get the most attention of the media - but its not about the QUARTERBACK (the candidate/official) - its a team effort (remember the them that Democracy is NOT a Spectator Sport ... well add to that - it IS a TEAM Sport).

As we all know - no matter how great a QB you have - the team cannot win without also having a good Center, a good Offensive Line, a good Defense, and good running backs and receivers. (Hey - this is the home of the University of Florida Gators - I think the Football analogy can be well understood).

So our objective is to build ourselves into a winning TEAM.

Charlie

(I hope to hear from all of you - with your ideas and suggestions - I take note of them all - and have really found them very useful and encouraging. Feel free to email me anytime (click the link)).

Charlie Grapski wrote on March 19, 2006 03:16 PM:

Oh - by the way - let me get some feedback from all of you on some of our themes for the campaign.

I don't like "the way its done" approach - that is the means wereby we preserve and reinforce the status quo - and thus fail to achieve the necessary changes we need.

Certainly I will learn from the elements of WISDOM in the "way things are traditionally done" - but its time to CHANGE THE GAME - and add new, innovative, and better methods and approaches to politics.

But one thing that has SOME wisdom - is the packaging of ideas so as to be easily and quickly attracting attention and gaining understanding. And the related idea of having THREE themes. At the same time - this is also limiting and artificial - and very prone to the EASY way (abuse) - of mere MANIPULATION of public opinion through the rhetorical techniques of the PR/Marketing consultants.

But I do have TWO SETS of three initial themes - that will be developed extensively - and will not be EXCLUSIVELY our concerns - but are two different levels of very important areas that need to be addressed and are, in the case of the first theme, generally ignored and neglected, and in the second set, generally spoken about in pandering promises but never actually delivered in actual policy practice.

So - just in general (without the details) - what do you guys think about these two themes:

SET ONE (getting to the essence of a functioning democracy)
1. Ethics
2. Education
3. Empowerment

SET TWO (dealing with some of the most significant particular policy areas of life outside of the political process):
1. Energy
2. Environment
3. Employment

Yes - two sets of EEE's!

I appreciate your comments and thoughts - you can discuss them here or email me (click) - and don't hesitate to analyze them critically. That is how we come to understanding - and eventually - agreement (that is really what being a "uniter not a divider" is all about - not the mere rhetoric of you know who's spin team).

Alternate link for comments

Tuesday, March 21, 2006

Tinfoil hats rendered obsolete

Here's what I've decided today. The Bush administration is spying on all of us. All the time, everywhere we go. Every purchase we make, every phonecall we place or receive, everything we post on the internet...

What? You say I'm being paranoid and that's not really happening? Okay, prove it.

You can't. Bush has said, "Yeah, I've spied on Americans without a warrent, and I'm gonna keep doing it. What are *you* gonna do about it, punk?" All right, those weren't his exact words, but that was certainly the gist of the message. And the Senate Intelligence Committee voted not to investigate the NSA wiretapping issue.

But many Democrats don't think that censuring Bush is a "winning issue". People are acting all irked and inconvenienced. This is taking us "off message". How dare Russ Feingold do such a thing? Right now we need to be as bland as possible, so that everybody will vote for us when the Republicans implode. That's the strategery, right?

I asked an Ohio candidate last week what he thought of the censure motion. He wasn't running for Senate, but since he was talking about the Bush administration's egregious power-grabbing, I thought I'd check out his thoughts on the matter. What I got was pretty much a nonanswer. He basically indicated that he was sympathetic to the point Feingold was trying to make, but that he "deals in reality", and realistically we are not going to be able to make this happen. The solution to all the problems we face right now are "new management".

That seems to be the stance of a lot of Democrats. Shhh. Don't say anything "controversial. Let us get back in control and we'll make everything better.

Why should I believe that? What evidence do I have that Democrats *can* actually get back in power? After all, anyone who opposes the goals of this administration could easily be seen as a "threat" and therefore subject to wiretapping. You think that's a "tinfoil hat" speculation? Fine, prove it. Prove that the opposition party is not being wiretapped. Oh, and let's talk about those voting machines that are still used in many elections--you know, the ones where everything is super secret and it's *illegal* to open them up and check to make sure they are working properly. How can we possibly know if these machines are properly recording which candidate gets the most votes. There was an *awful* lot of funny business in the 2004 election in Ohio, and who knows how much more happened and was never discovered. And the people running the show could feel safe that we would never completely connect the dots, because even Democrats played along and "distanced" themselves from the "craaaazy" conspiracy theorists who asked these questions.

Back to the spying thing, we *do* know that people have been flagged for "special attention" simply because they belonged to a peace group. I read about one couple that came to the attention of Homeland Security simply because they payed off their credit card. They found out when they discovered that the money they sent in had not been credited to their account--because it was "under investigation".

The bottom line is this--if we can only stand up for our rights when we are in the majority, we are in deep doo-doo. The more power the corrupt people in charge are able to amass, the more they are able to insure that they stay in power.



Oh, and, by the way...
September 11! (Booga-booga!) Apparently that's the gist of the new attack ad against Russ Feingold.

Timid Dems, the time to redeem yourselves is now. Support Russ Feingold's censure resolution and prove to Americans that you're not too timid to lead, no matter what the challenge.

Alternate link for comments

Weekly DemocracyFest Update

DemocracyFest will take place at San Diego State University, July 14 - 16, 2006

I'm going to start posting a weekly update on Democracy Fest here each Tuesday morning.

I figured I should start with something simple like...

PLEASE BUY YOUR TICKETS NOW! ;-)

http://www.democracyfest.us/

Here is a breakdown of the ticket purchase options:

DemocracyFest Ticket - $55
Gives you access to all of the trainings, speakers, and entertainment taking place on Thurs - Sun, except the Sat Dinner, Bloggers Breakfast, and Sat Night Blowout.

Saturday Night Blowout - $20
The big Saturday night event featuring Gov. Howard Dean

Saturday Night Dinner - $30
Dinner with speakers and entertainment, preceeding the Sat Night Blowout

Bloggers Breakfast - $15
Darrell's Bloggers' Breakfast is back! You don't want to miss this.

On Campus Lodging
There are several on site room options available for purchase through the website, varying in price.

Scholarships
We realize that the cost associated with the event may make it difficult for some people to attend. We have made some funds available for scholarships for those who need them.

If you have any questions, just email me at jjem1999 (at) yahoo.com or post them here in the comments section.

Alternate link for comments

DFA Supports Censure?

Last night Chris Warshaw of Democracy for America was the special blogging guest over at My Vote is My Voice. Toward the end of the hour jc asked Chris,

"Does DFA have a position on Feingold's censure motion?"


And Chris replied,

"We do support Censure. We're currently assessing the best way to persuade more Senators to take our position. Let me know if you have any ideas!"


Really? DFA supports censure? You'd never know. Chris' tepid reply doesn't inspire confidence that DFA is going to be out in front on this one.

Tom Hughes posted just one diary last week over at Daily Kos: It's just horse sense. I got my hopes up when I clicked through and here's what I found: A diary about paper ballots and a new flash movie DFA put together about the importance of paper ballots.

I know these guys watch the news and read the papers. Russ Feingold introduces a Senate resolution censuring the President on March 13--and on March 15, DFA posts about paper ballots.

Bob Brigham posted the following comment:

I mean, I'm in favor of paper ballots and all, but uh, what about the whole censure thing?


I agreed with Bob. It really made DFA look like it wasn't on top of the situation. Just to make sure I wasn't totally uninformed, I went over to BFA to see what has been posted since March 13. Here's what I found:

March 13: A link to watch Feingold introduce his resolution on C-Span.
March 14: A paragraph in the Monday news roundup about the resolution.

Compare this with the number of posts FireDogLake that are devoted to or mention Feingold's resolution: at least 20 by my count. FDL is primarily run by 2 people, Jane Hamsher and Christy Hardin Smith (aka ReddHedd) but they've recruited other contributors. And they manage to cover other important topics like the Scooter Libby investigation as well.

If DFA supports censure with the caveat that they're waiting for the outcome of an investigation, they're going to have a looooong wait:

There is not going to be an investigation, we know it, they know it and George Bush knows it. The Senate Intelligence Committee voted on March 7 not to investigate. Do they somehow think Arlen Specter is suddenly going to change his stripes? The censure resolution has been referred to the Judiciary Committee, which if the GOP holds true to form will probably mean they'll wind up investigating Feingold for treason. (FireDogLake)
I want to ask DFA the same questions that Russ Feingold posed recently on the Charlie Rose show:

How can we be afraid at this point, of standing up to a president who has clearly mismanaged this Iraq war, who clearly made one of the largest blunders in American foreign policy history? How can it be that this party wants to stand back and allow this kind of thing to happen?

And then add to that the idea that the president has clearly broken the law --- and a number of Republican senators have effectively admitted that, by saying "you know, we need this program so let's make it legal," --- so they are admitting it's illegal.

The idea that Democrats don't think it's a winning thing to say that we will stand up for the rule of law and for checking abuse of power by the executive --- I just can't believe that Democrats don't think that isn't something, not only that we can win on, but it does, in fact, make the base of our party, which is so important, feel much better about the Democrats. The Republicans care deeply about making the base of their party feels energized. What about the people of our party who believe in the Democratic Party especially because they fight for the American values of standing up for our rights and civil liberties?

(Hat tip to Digby--emphases mine)

Suddenly my reply to Chris last night doesn't seem quite so cranky.

Alternate link to comment.

Monday, March 20, 2006

Howard Dean corrects Counterpunch. Good for him.

On March 7, 2006, David Lindorff wrote this in an article at Counterpunch. He was totally wrong on this, and Howard Dean emailed him to please correct it. Dean's answer below. He implies it makes him get noticed as a journalist.

Groundswell for Impeachment

"While researching our book on impeachment (The Case for Impeachment: The Legal Argument for Removing George W. Bush from Office, St. Martin's Press, due out in late April), my co-author Barbara Olshanshky and I have found that members of Congress-even firebrands like Maxine Waters (D-CA) and Cynthia McKinney (D-GA)-have been strong-armed behind the scenes by the Democratic National Committee not to introduce an impeachment bill in the House. Rep. John Conyers, the ranking minority member of the House Judiciary Committee, where such a bill would be considered, has submitted three bills that relate to impeachment-a proposal for a special committee to investigate possible impeachable crimes by the administration and bills to censure both the president and the vice president for refusing to answer questions from Congress on impeachment-related issues--but that's as far as the Democratic congressional leadership is willing to go."
Then he gets a letter from Howard Dean, and he gives a snip of it in this article, also at Counterpunch. He lost me at "it's nice to be noticed as a columnist."

Howard Dean Tells CounterPunch: DNC No Foe of Impeachment Drive

I got an personal email from Democratic National Committee Chair Howard Dean today. On a Sunday morning, the DNC chief wrote me to take issue with what I wrote on March 7 in this space. I said that pressure from Democratic party leaders was the reason not one member of the House has filed a bill of impeachment against our president for trashing the U.S. Constitution.

The article clearly hit a nerve.

"The DNC is not in the business of telling Congress to go easy on this President," Dean wrote. "I'd be grateful if you could correct the report."

It's nice to be noticed as a columnist, and I will clarify my point. I agree with Dean that the DNC as an organization is not telling Congress anything.
Good for Howard for standing up for himself. Too bad he must fight the left and the right to do his job. We have a long way to go in this battle for the party's soul. Not everyone will get everything they want. Life is just not that way. Honesty is always the best policy. You got noticed, Mr. Lindorff, because you told an untruth, not because you did a good job on that particular article.

Alternate link for comments

MViMV Guest Blog tonight

Tonight's My Vote is My Voice Guest Blogger will be Chris Warshaw from Democracy For America. Chris will discuss "Organizing locally to win in 2006 and beyond".

Please join us tonight from 8-9pm EST.

http://blog.myvoteismyvoice.com/

Alternate link for comments

Monday non-birthday thread

I know that Jessica has a post waiting in the wings about tonight's My Vote is My Voice guest blog, but there are some things I'd like to give front page attention, so I'm putting up one of those all-purpose threads. Everything but the kitchen sink. Unless, of course, anyone knows of any important kitchen sink-related legislation that is coming down soon and needs our attention.

Think Progress has a great Three Years of War in Iraq Timeline.

Christine Cegelis' primary is tomorrow, and her web site has information about how you can help.

Leave your birthday greetings for jc in this thread.

And check out Karen in MI's blog Namaste for a new feature:

Welcome to the first MONDAY MEME! Bring your cup of coffee along and most of all, your valued opinion. Every Monday I will post your comments with follow-up questions. Please email me with your suggestions, possibly with a link if it a news-related event. I will toss them all in a hat and draw the lucky winner!
And happy first day of spring!

Photo from bomolai.typepad.com

Alternate link for comments

Happy Birthday, jc!



Happy birthday, jc, and thank you for all you do! Let's show jc, who is spending this birthday away from her kitties, some blog family love.

Image hosting by Photobucket


The picture of jc's cats is from the collection of "who we are" response ads to the "latte drinking, sushi eating" attack ads.

Here's one of jc's graphics that was featured on Blog for America, once upon a time, in a galaxy far, far away...




And here's another...



Links to some of this amazing, hard-working, talented woman's web sites...

Graphics for America
Take Your Country Back
The Blog Family (includes the birthday calendar)
jc's designs blog


Alternate link for comments

Peace Rally in Columbus, March 18

If anyone has pictures or stories from a peace rally you attended over the weekend that you would like to share, I'd love to be able to post them here. E-mail pictures and/or a first-person account of your local event to howardempowered at gmail.com. Here's a link to the story in the Columbus Dispatch.

Beating drums made of pots and paint buckets, some protesters marched to the Statehouse in rhythm from Goodale Park, where they gathered with others before joining a crowd estimated at nearly 1,000 Downtown.
...
Beth Lerman, of Dayton, held a flag as she stood with other members of Military Families Speak Out.

Lerman, whose son fought in the first Gulf War, said voicing her views and questioning the war is an exercise in democracy and freedom.

"That's what they are fighting for - to protect our freedom," said Lerman, who traveled to Crawford, Texas, last year and protested outside President Bush's home with activist Cindy Sheehan.

"It's our kids that are paying the price," Lerman said. "We are obligated to see they aren't misused and their trust not betrayed after they have laid down their lives for this country."

More about the rally, including photos by Mike Gruber, can be found here.



Alternate link for comments

Sunday, March 19, 2006

From subjects to citizens

Charlie Grapski just posted this over at the big blog.

You guys may know the story about the American Revolutionary Army under Washington.

Early on - things were looking bleak - as Washington camped his troops at Valley Forge. The well-meaning, but ill-equipped army (the real problem however was poorly trained army - rather than just the equipment ... which was exagerated a bit by Washington in an effort to get more support from Congress). They were holding on ... but the British were dominating - and many thought the effort would eventually fail.

Then - before the French were brought in by Franklin (a BIG boost - not only strategically (diverting the British forces into sending troops down to the Indies - to prevent the WORLD WAR from giving the French an opportunity to take away some of the British possessions) but also in MORALE) - Franklin had an even greater impact.

He went to the PRUSSIAN ARMY (the best then in the world - even better than the other big guy - the British) - and recruited "Baron" and "General" von Steuben.

Of course - this was a little "fib" of Franklin - who knew the "aristocratic" military leadership would not accept someone of lesser status - as he really was not a General or a big Noble - but more of a DRILL SERGEANT (he was actually a Captain).

But von Steuben, who spoke NO ENGLISH, came and DRAMATICALLY CHANGED the American revolutionaries into a world-class army - nearly overnight!

He was faced with a daunting challenge - one that most people would view as futile. How to turn, in short time and with little resources, a rag-tag group into a professional military that could realistically stand up to one of the world's greatest military powers?

He knew he could not train EVERY single soldier overnight. So he established a MODEL army. He focused on a small group - and trained them into a TOP-NOTCH force in a short time.

The MODEL then was SPREAD throughout the forces.

And thus - we WON our independence!

Well - we have a SIMILAR situation facing us again. Again - facing a tyranical power, again being relatively untrained (as citizens), and feeling disempowered ... we have a daunting challenge in front of us - FOR THE FUTURE.

Thus - this campaign will be like building a MODEL ARMY OF CITIZENS. Training us to no longer act like mere SUBJECTS (passive receptors of the policy decisions of OTHERS who rule over us) and into an EFFECTIVE force of CITIZENS (who rule themselves).

That is how we RESTORE our democracy - and REPLACE (and overthrow) our "tyranny."

Charlie

(What do you think, by the way?)

Alternative link for comments