"It’s best to say we gave little and got little. But the chances of a military confrontation are much lower than they were at the end of last year." Although, despite DT's previous bellicosity (word chosen deliberately), I never thought there was much chance of war. The summit certainly increased Kim's stature, especially at home, but otherwise was as near-meaningless as expected.
Why pharmaceuticals could be the prescription for trade warfare that truly hurts America[Click] “Opinion: If Canada wants to decisively threaten maximum pain and stop the escalating trade war with the U.S., it should propose expropriating pharmaceutical patents.” The only criticism I would make is that for maximum effect Canada should not threaten to do this, but simply do it; the psychological effect would be far greater.
I just sent approval of this idea off to the office of Premier Trudeau. Now that I have decided how to get past the filters intended to limit missives to those from Canadian citizens, it's a piece of cake. (I used an address based on that of my grandfather; the post office disappeared long ago.)
Hmm. Remember that many of the largest pharmaceutical companies are not US based. Aside from the treaty violations involved, I'm not sure how this would work.
I found this remark puzzling, so I read the article to see what event you might be referring to. It turns out that the guy isn't talking about expropriating patents at all. He's talking about compulsory licensing -- which is much simpler, more straightforward, and understandable. And it would target specific drugs that are currently big money-makers for specifically US companies. But I think he probably exaggerates the effect, since it only affects the Canadian market and patent exclusivity typically only lasts for a few years. But still, it's a stronger measure than most tariffs would be.
This is for you, Susan; I hope it holds up: A new Enquirer/Suffolk University poll in Ohio – the first statewide, independent poll since the Ohio primary – showed Richard Cordray (D) leading Mike DeWine (R) in the governor’s race, 43% to 36% among likely voters. In the U.S. Senate race, Sen. Sherrod Brown (D) leads challenger Jim Renacci (R), 53% to 37%.
This seems to be as good a summary as any of what happened in Singapore (hint: win-win-win for Kim):
ReplyDeleteA Nothingburger in Our Time[Click]
—Alan
"It’s best to say we gave little and got little. But the chances of a military confrontation are much lower than they were at the end of last year." Although, despite DT's previous bellicosity (word chosen deliberately), I never thought there was much chance of war. The summit certainly increased Kim's stature, especially at home, but otherwise was as near-meaningless as expected.
DeleteWhy pharmaceuticals could be the prescription for trade warfare that truly hurts America[Click] “Opinion: If Canada wants to decisively threaten maximum pain and stop the escalating trade war with the U.S., it should propose expropriating pharmaceutical patents.” The only criticism I would make is that for maximum effect Canada should not threaten to do this, but simply do it; the psychological effect would be far greater.
ReplyDelete—Alan
I just sent approval of this idea off to the office of Premier Trudeau. Now that I have decided how to get past the filters intended to limit missives to those from Canadian citizens, it's a piece of cake. (I used an address based on that of my grandfather; the post office disappeared long ago.)
DeleteAlan
Hmm. Remember that many of the largest pharmaceutical companies are not US based. Aside from the treaty violations involved, I'm not sure how this would work.
DeleteRats--got the link wrong. Here goes again.--Alan
DeleteWhy pharmaceuticals could be the prescription for trade warfare that truly hurts America[Click]
OK, that works. I think the short answer, Bill, is that it would work the same way it did before.
DeleteAlan
I found this remark puzzling, so I read the article to see what event you might be referring to. It turns out that the guy isn't talking about expropriating patents at all. He's talking about compulsory licensing -- which is much simpler, more straightforward, and understandable. And it would target specific drugs that are currently big money-makers for specifically US companies. But I think he probably exaggerates the effect, since it only affects the Canadian market and patent exclusivity typically only lasts for a few years. But still, it's a stronger measure than most tariffs would be.
DeleteCurrent Time Magazine cover.[Click] [verified]
ReplyDelete—Alan
Senate panel rejects Trump’s proposed Interior, EPA cuts - Click
ReplyDeleteAs one commenter on The Hill's FB page pointed out, they have to maintain funding levels just to pay the interior decorators.
Tell the Trump Administration: Stop tearing apart immigrant families at the border - Click
ReplyDeleteDems flip heavy Trump district in Wisconsin - Click
ReplyDeleteMark Sanford concedes to Katie Arrington in SC District 1 race, losing his first election[Click]
ReplyDeleteDarn. Despite his temporary extreme foolishness around Nude Hiking Day, there was a lot to like, and a lot to respect, about Sanford. He seemed like the embodiment of the effective local pol.
North Korea State Media Says Trump Agreed to Lift Sanctions Against North[Click] So Trumpy got totally rolled? Never send a boy to do a (wo)man’s job.
This is for you, Susan; I hope it holds up:
A new Enquirer/Suffolk University poll in Ohio – the first statewide, independent poll since the Ohio primary – showed Richard Cordray (D) leading Mike DeWine (R) in the governor’s race, 43% to 36% among likely voters. In the U.S. Senate race, Sen. Sherrod Brown (D) leads challenger Jim Renacci (R), 53% to 37%.
Why you should never let a kid play with a loaded tariff…[Click]
—Alan